Wednesday, 6 May 2015



centring

Interactive demo: Fitting ZEISS lenses

1. Anatomic Fitting

Anatomic Fitting
After the preliminary anatomic fitting of the spectacles, the selected frame should be

  • fitted to a corneal vertex distance of between 12 and 16 mm and
  • display a (tilt) pantoscopic angle of between 8° and 12°.

If not specified individually for customised lenses, ZEISS lenses are designed for these parameters. These recommended values cannot always be observed due to special anatomic conditions or to an unusual frame shape. The optician should then take this into account in refraction and the lens order.

2. Lateral Centration

Lateral Centration for ZEISS Lenses without Prismatic Power
Lateral centration of ZEISS lenses without prismatic power

Lateral Centration for ZEISS Lenses without Prismatic Power

The centration distance should correspond to the interpupillary distance when the patient is looking into the distance (distance PD).
This applies to all ZEISS lenses:

  • Single vision lenses for distance and near
  • Officelenses, the proximity lens
  • Progressive lenses
  • Bifocal and trifocal lenses it is standard practice to use the segment tops as reference points in lateral centration. These are each marked at a distance of 2.5 mm nasally from the distance PD.

3. Vertical Centration

Vertical Centration of ZEISS Lenses
1. Natural head posture
2. Head posture for marking the vertical centration according to the "centre-of-rotation requirement" (frame plane perpendicular)

Vertical Centration of ZEISS Lenses

Single vision lenses and Office lenses
The "centre of rotation requirement", i. e. the lens is centred when its optical axis runs through the eye’s optical centre of rotation, should be met in the fitting of single vision lenses and office lenses. There are two ways of determining the vertical centration:

  • The patient raises his head until the frame plane is perpendicular. The pupil centres are then marked, with the patient’s eyes in the zero visual direction (looking straight-ahead).
  • With the patient’s head and body in a natural posture, the positions of the pupil centres are marked for the zero visual direction (looking straight-ahead).

Learn moreLearn more

4. ...with Prismatic Power

Centration of ZEISS Lenses with prismatic power

Centration of ZEISS Lenses with Prismatic Power

In prismatic prescriptions the centration points determined must be displaced by 0.25 mm per 1 cm/m in the opposite direction to the prism base. This takes into account the movement of the eyes in prismatic lenses.

Learn moreLearn more

5. ...with i.Terminal 2

Centration with i.Terminal 2

Centration with i.Terminal 2

The computer-assisted i.Terminal 2 fitting system can be used to determine all centration data with extreme precision using two video images, with the patient’s head and body in a natural posture. The correct position of the centration points is calculated and displayed on the basis of the applicable centration requirement, the dioptric power and the lens type.

Measurement of centering errors, automated adjustment and mounting of lenses

Josef Heinisch, Trioptics GmbH

Classical optical measurement techniques combined with modern PC technology provide accurate alignment, bonding and cementing of optical components and systems. These processes are fully automated and significantly reduce production time and cost.
The processes involved in manufacturing optical lenses – grinding, polishing and coating – have become increasingly automated in the past few decades. Computer numerical controlled grinding and polishing machines, as well as computer-controlled interferometers for the examination of the surface profile, are in widespread use.

However, many lens manufacturers still use simple optical or tactile measurement instruments for determining centering errors. More often than not, the lenses are still adjusted manually. The adjustment and centering errors of the optical components have a decisive influence on the image quality of the lens. The use of electronic autocollimators and automated adjustment equipment makes the mounting process quicker and more precise – for example, when cementing achromatic lenses or bonding lenses into a mount.

Centration error measurement

When measuring a centering error using the reflection mode (Figure 1), an electronic autocollimator, read via a PC, is at the core of the measurement. An illuminated target (usually a reticule) is projected at the center of curvature of the spherical or almost spherical lens surface under investigation. In this instance, the rays of light meet the surface at an almost perpendicular angle. Some of the light is reflected back along the exact path it came (a condition of autocollimation) and displays the target on a CCD camera. A lateral shift of the center of curvature creates a direct lateral shift of the reticule image.


Figure 1.
This diagram demonstrates the principle of measuring centering errors with an electronic autocollimator using the reflection mode.


If the surface under investigation is rotated around a reference axis, a corresponding circular movement of the reticule image is created on the CCD sensor. The radius of this circular path is directly proportional to the position of the center of curvature in relation to the reference axis. The live reticule image depicts the exact position of the center of curvature in the X-Y axis, whereby the center of the circular path represents a reference point in the overall space. Powerful light sources and light-sensitive CCD sensors ensure that even test items that are well antireflection-coated produce a sufficient autocollimation image.

In extreme cases, it is also possible to carry out the measurement using near-infrared (750- to 1000-nm) illumination. In this spectral range, the antireflection coatings optimized for the visible range have enough reflectivity. As an alternative to incoherent light sources, laser autocollimators are available, although these can produce images that are difficult to interpret due to speckling.

Centration error measurement of objectives

The effectiveness of measuring centering errors with an electronic autocollimator in combination with computers is apparent when measuring multiple lenses.1 This method identifies the centering error of each individual lens surface in a mounted optical assembly. Any selected axis of rotation serves as a reference axis. Suitably precise air bearings with radial and axial runout errors of <0.05 μm are available.

First, the centering error of the outermost optical surface is measured in relation to the axis of rotation. The next step is to focus in to the center of curvature of the second optical surface. For the calculation of the position of the center of curvature (Z), the optical properties of the first outermost surface must be taken into account. When evaluating the true centering error (X, Y) of the second surface using optical calculations, it is also necessary to take into consideration both the optical properties and the centering error of the first surface previously measured. This calculation simply requires the design data (radius, center thickness, refractive index) of the item under investigation. When the exact centering error of the second surface has been identified, the centering error of the third surface can be measured, and so on. This measurement process has proved itself to be extremely robust.

Using design data alone is more than suitable for the evaluation, as it is unusual for a significant difference to exist between that data and actual lens measurements. In practice, it is possible to gauge with a single autocollimator the positioning errors of 20 or more surfaces to an exactness of <1 μm. To clarify the effectiveness of this measurement process, Figure 2 shows the measurement results of an optical assembly. The sample assembly consists of two identical achromatic lenses with surface radii in the region of 40 to 120 mm. The multiple-lens measurement provides the exact position of all the centers of curvature in relation to the rotational axis. Since an achromatic system consists of three optical surfaces, the optical axis of a single achromatic lens can be displayed via a regression line through the three centers of curvature. This is indicated by the dotted blue and green lines in Figure 2.


Figure 2.
Measurement of the angle and the distance of the optical axes of the lenses to each other.


If the optical axes are known, it is possible to define the angle and distance between both optical axes (here in the plane of the upper vertex). These calculations are automatically executed as part of the measurement process. The results are shown in Figure 2. The multiple-lens measurement of the objective has been carried out four times. After each measurement, the item under investigation was removed from the bearing and, without any particular provisions, replaced for the next (measurement at a 90° azimuth angle). The result is a standard deviation of 0.16 μm in the distance measurement of both optical axes.

If the exact positions (X, Y, Z) of all centers of curvature are known in a fixed system of coordinates, this information may be used to optimize the optical assembly. In the example given here, the upper achromatic lens can be realigned by the previously measured magnitude of 8.8 μm in the direction of the optical axis of the lower lens (green line).

Automated cementing of achromatic lenses

There is a new process for adjusting two single lenses of an achromatic lens.2 Based on the multiple lens method, it does away with the precise initial adjustment of both lenses. Instead, the exact position of each of the three centers of curvature is identified in its uncemented state. The axis of rotation of a highly accurate bearing serves as a reference axis for the measurement of the centering error, but not as a reference axis for the adjustment. Hence there is no need for precise, self-centering mechanical holders. Both lenses are fixed to the rotor of the bearing, and their center remains unaltered throughout the measurement process. The cement between the lenses is still fluid at this point.


Figure 3.
The multilens measurement method is used for the automated adjustment of achromatic lenses in the cementing process.


Once the centering error has been measured, the center of curvature of the upper sphere is adjusted according to the optical axis of the lower lens. A ring-shaped support, fitted with an X-Y piezo actuator, is placed on the upper lens. It moves the upper lens so that all three centers of curvature eventually lie on the one line, the optical axis (Figure 3). The cement is then hardened using UV light. The entire measurement and adjustment cycle lasts only 10 to 15 seconds. This method is five to 10 times more accurate than the manual process and is particularly effective in the production of small optical components with 1-mm diameters – endoscopes, for example.

Automated bonding of lenses into a mount

When bonding lenses and optical elements into a mount, the optical axes of these elements must be brought into line with the axis of the mount itself. The axis of the mount can be given in terms of the symmetrical axis of a cylindrical mount. An instrument for the precise alignment and bonding is shown in Figure 4.


Figure 4.
The frontal view is shown of an automated centering and bonding station for the assembly of lenses into a mount.


Figure 5 is a schematic representation of the basic process. The workpiece (mount with unglued lens) is positioned on the rotor of a rotational axis. The mount’s support has previously been aligned to the axis of rotation to a degree of accuracy of 2 μm. A so-called hydraulic expansion chuck is used as the support, which can transfer the center accuracy almost perfectly to the lens mount.

Before the centering error is measured, a robot arm moves in with a dispenser of UV-curable glue. The glue is applied to the lens and the mount by rotating the test item 360°. The centering error of the upper lens surface is now determined using the autocollimator.


Figure 5.
Panels A to D show the step-by-step process of automatically bonding a lens into a mount.


Since the mount and therefore also the ring-shaped face of the lower lens surface are centered perfectly with respect to the axis of rotation, it is sufficient to center the upper surface. To achieve this, a manipulator is introduced on another robot arm. The manipulator may be fitted with either a single-axis piezo actuator (Figure 4) or with three single-axis piezo actuators (Figure 6), which are fixed at 120° from one another on a ring. In the instance where only one actuator is used, the test item must be rotated before the final adjustment in such a way that the axis of rotation, the center of curvature and the piezo axis are all on the same line. If three actuators are used, the lens can be adjusted on the center of rotation without rotating the sample again.


Figure 6.
Pictured is an automated bonding station with three piezo actuators.


The accuracy of the adjustment can be increased by taking an additional measurement of the position of the mount’s axis. A linear measuring sensor (resolution 0.1 μm) is placed on the edge of the mount (Figure 7) and takes measurements over a 360° rotation. The results are presented using a sine curve that identifies the X-Y coordinates (centering error) of the mount. Using the piezo actuators, the lens can now be adjusted to the direct center of the mount (green cross in Figure 7).

Once the lens has been successfully adjusted, the glue can be hardened by switching on a UV light source. The advantage of such a process is that the lens can be adjusted with great exactness on the mount, without the mount itself having to be perfectly adjusted to the axis of rotation. The multiple-lens measurement described here, the cementing of achromatic lenses and the gluing of lenses are perfect examples of the advantages of a computer-aided measurement of centering errors.

Figure 7. The center of the mount’s circumference can be identified using an additional measurement sensor. The lens is positioned using three needles (set apart from one another at a 120° angle) and adjusted to the center of the mount.

The previously laborious and therefore expensive form of adjustment has been simplified by intelligent measurement technology. The consistent use of this technology enables a greater degree of accuracy in the production of optical systems and therefore new design opportunities for more compact and higher-quality lenses











Monday, 4 May 2015

Visual acuity, lens and fundus oculi

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Your Message

Type the characters you see below
captcha


- See more at: http://optometrist.com.au/risks-glaucoma-surgery/#sthash.VGOe4tNH.dpuf
Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Your Message

Type the characters you see below
captcha


- See more at: http://optometrist.com.au/risks-glaucoma-surgery/#sthash.VGOe4tNH.dpuf
Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Your Message

Type the characters you see below
captcha


- See more at: http://optometrist.com.au/risks-glaucoma-surgery/#sthash.VGOe4tNH.dpuf
Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Your Message

Type the characters you see below
captcha


- See more at: http://optometrist.com.au/risks-glaucoma-surgery/#sthash.VGOe4tNH.dpuf
Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Your Message

Type the characters you see below
captcha


- See more at: http://optometrist.com.au/risks-glaucoma-surgery/#sthash.VGOe4tNH.dpuf
Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Your Message

Type the characters you see below
captcha


- See more at: http://optometrist.com.au/risks-glaucoma-surgery/#sthash.VGOe4tNH.dpuf
Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Your Message

Type the characters you see below
captcha


- See more at: http://optometrist.com.au/risks-glaucoma-surgery/#sthash.VGOe4tNH.dpuf

Friday, 1 May 2015

  • Afferent pathway - optic disc/nerve, optic chiasm, optic tract and the pretectal nucleus (lying in the dorsal midbrain).
  • Efferent pathway - this passes through the Edinger-Westphal nucleus before travelling along with the third cranial nerve out to the iris (with a synapse at the ciliary ganglion which sits in the orbit).
There are several reflexes subserved by this pathway and each should be examined in turn. Damage at any level of the pathway or abnormalities of the iris itself can cause abnormalities of pupil shape or function.


General examination of the patient

This often-missed component of the examination may provide helpful clues as to what is going on, particularly where there is an underlying neurological cause. There may be a telltale neck scar and associated ptosis in patients with Horner's syndrome or a neurosurgical scar in patients with a third nerve palsy. It may be necessary to go back to the general observation and carry out a further examination depending on the pupillary findings (eg, check for the absent ankle or knee jerk in Adie's pupil).

Pupillary observation

Start by a general observation, noting the shape and size of the pupil in ambient bright light. Size is measured in millimetres and the normal pupil ranges from 1-8 mm. Next, dim the light and have the patient fixate on the far wall. You can then observe the pupils closely by shining a bright light on the patient's face from below (minimise the shadow cast by the nose by placing the light in the midline). If you think there is size asymmetry, a good trick is to stand back and observe the red reflex of both eyes simultaneously with the ophthalmoscope. A slight difference will then become more apparent. If you have access to a slit lamp, use it as a lot of more detailed information can be gauged about the abnormally shaped pupil.

Assessing pupillary reflexes

There are essentially three reflexes to specifically test for:[1]
Light reflex test
  • What it assesses - the integrity of the pupillary light reflex pathway.
  • How to perform it - dim the ambient light and ask the patient to fixate a distant target. Illuminate the right eye from the right side and the left from the left side. (Make sure you do not stand in front of the patient, as their pupils will accommodate to focus on you.) Record whether there is a direct pupillary response (the pupil constricts when the light is shone on it) and a consensual response (the fellow pupil constricts too).
  • Normal test - there should be a brisk, simultaneous, equal response of both pupils in response to light shone in one or the other eye.
Swinging flashlight test
  • What it assesses - compares direct and consensual responses of each eye (as opposed to seeing whether they are there or not).
  • How to perform it - use the same conditions as for the light reflex test and check this reflex first. Then, move the beam swiftly and rhythmically from one eye to the other, making sure that you allow the same amount of light exposure on each eye and that each is illuminated from the same angle. You should note the pupillary constriction of both eyes when the beam is maintained. However, when it is swung, look at what happens to the pupil of the eye you are concerned about and compare this with what is happening to the fellow eye.
  • Normal test - the pupil should constrict or stay the same size. If it dilates when light is shone on it, then this means that the light reflex is weaker than theconsensual reflex (produced by withdrawing light from the unaffected eye), suggesting optic nerve pathology. This abnormal response is known as a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) and is a very important sign. Note that this is a comparative test: you cannot have a bilateral RAPD.
Near reflex test
  • What it assesses - this assesses the miosis component of near fixation, otherwise known as accommodation. (The other two components of accommodation are increased lens thickness and curvature, and convergence of the eyes.)
  • How to perform it - in a normally lit room, instruct the patient to look at a distant target. Bring an object (a toy, the patient's thumb) into their near point (about an arm's length away) and observe the pupillary reflex when their fixation shifts to the near target.
  • Normal test - there should be a brisk constriction. A near-light dissociation describes the situation where the patient has a significantly better pupillary near reflex than light reflex.

Anisocoria[2]

This refers to unequal pupils. This is physiological in about 20% of people.[3] However, if this is a new complaint, the steps to the underlying diagnosis lie in determining which of the pupils is abnormal and then looking for associated signs. The first step is to compare the pupils in light and dim conditions:
  • If there is a poor reaction to light in one eye and the anisocoria is more evident in a well lit room, the affected pupil is abnormally large.
  • If there is a good reaction to light in both eyes but a poor dilation in the dark (ie the anisocoria is enhanced), the affected pupil is abnormally small.
The large pupil[4]
  • Features - there is poor constriction in a well lit room.
  • Differential diagnosis - traumatic iris damage, third cranial nerve palsy, pharmacological dilation (ie dilating drops), Adie's pupil, iris rubeosis.
The small pupil[4]
  • Features - there is poor dilation in a dim room.
  • Differential diagnosis - physiologically small pupil, pilocarpine drops, uveitis with synaechiae, Horner's syndrome.

The abnormally shaped pupil

  • Features - a pupil should be round. Deviation from this suggests abnormalities.
  • Differential diagnosis - congenital defects (eg, coloboma), iris inflammation or trauma, Argyll Robertson pupils. A fixed oval pupil in association with severe pain, a red eye, a cloudy cornea and systemic malaise suggests acute angle-closure glaucoma which warrants immediate referral.

The abnormally reacting pupil

  • Light reflex test - abnormalities arise as a result of severe optic nerve damage (eg, transection) - the patient will be blind in that eye, neither pupil reacts when the affected side is stimulated but both pupils react normally when the fellow eye is stimulated.[5]
  • Swinging flashlight test[2] - when the pupil exhibits an RAPD, it is described as a Marcus Gunn pupil. It suggests optic nerve disease, central retinal artery or vein occlusions (see the separate article on Non-diabetic Retinal Vascular Disease). A mild RAPD may also occur in amblyopia, with vitreous haemorrhage, retinal detachment or advanced macular degeneration.
  • Near reflex test - there are several causes of light-near dissociation which can be grouped according to whether the problem is unilateral or bilateral:[5]
    • Unilateral light-near dissociation - afferent conduction defect, Adie pupil, herpes zoster ophthalmicus, aberrant regeneration of the third cranial nerve.
    • Bilateral - neurosyphilis, diabetes, myotonic dystrophy, Parinaud's dorsal midbrain syndrome, familial amyloidosis, encephalitis, chronic alcoholism.

Congenital abnormalities[5]

  • Aniridia - this is a bilateral condition arising from the abnormal neuroectodermal development secondary to genetic mutation. It is associated with glaucoma and a number of serious, systemic abnormalities.
  • Coloboma - this is an uncommon, congenital condition characterised by a unilateral or bilateral partial iris defect. There may be other associated defects both within the eye (eg, the retina) and in the adnexial structures (eg, the lids).
  • Leukocoria - this refers to a white pupil and may be due to a number of conditions.[6] Congenital cataracts are generally easily identified but all patients must be assessed for the possibility of retinoblastoma. Other conditions causing a white pupil include persistent fetal vasculature syndrome, Coats' disease andretinopathy of prematurity.

Acquired structural abnormalities

  • Pseudoexfoliation syndrome - this is a condition characterised by the presence of a grey-white fibrogranular extracellular matrix material deposited on the anterior lens. It is seen, on slit-lamp examination, as a fine grey dusting around the pupil. Pupil shape and function are not affected - it is clinically significant due to its association with glaucoma and its potential to make cataract surgery more tricky.
  • Sphincter tear - iris tear can occur as a result of blunt or penetrating trauma and can also occur during intraocular surgery. Tears may be associated with glaucoma and, if large, visual problems. All tears, however small, need ophthalmological assessment.
  • Synechiae - this refers to adhesions between the lens and the iris (posterior synechiae) or the iris and the peripheral cornea (peripheral anterior synechiae). These adhesions will give rise to an abnormally shaped pupil; treatment depends on the underlying cause. Uveitic posterior synechiae are broken with mydriatics whereas glaucomatous anterior synechiae may be managed with miotics.

Neurological abnormalities

  • Horner's syndrome - see link for separate article.

    Causes of Horner's syndrome[7]

    Central (first-order) nerve lesionsPreganglionic (second-order) nerve lesionsPostganglionic (third-order) nerve lesions
    Cerebrovascular accidents.Apical lung tumours (eg, Pancoast's tumour).Cluster headaches or migraine.
    Multiple sclerosis.Lymphadenopathy (lymphoma, leukaemia, tuberculosis, mediastinal tumours).Herpes zoster infection.
    Pituitary or basal skull tumours.Lower brachial plexus trauma or cervical rib.Internal carotid artery dissection.[8]
    Basal meningitis (eg, syphilis).Aneurysms of the aorta, subclavian or common carotid arteries.Raeder's syndrome (paratrigeminal syndrome).
    Neck trauma (eg, cervical vertebral dislocation or dissection of the vertebral artery).Trauma or surgical injury (neck or chest).[9]Carotid-cavernous fistula.
    Syringomyelia.Neuroblastoma.
    Arnold-Chiari malformation.Mandibular dental abscess.
    Spinal cord tumours.

    Confirmation of Horner's syndrome is with instillation of a drop of 4% cocaine: in physiological anisocoria, this results in dilation whereas it doesn't where there is a Horner's syndrome.

    Further localisation of the problem is carried out with 1% hydroxyamfetamine. Instillation is done >48 hours after the cocaine test as cocaine affects the hydroxyamfetamine. Pupillary dilation suggests a central or preganglionic Horner's syndrome whereas if dilation does not occur, the lesion is likely to be postganglionic.
  • Midbrain pupils - this refers to the bilateral mid-dilated pupils associated with dorsal midbrain lesions. There is a light-near dissociation but a good response to miotics and mydriatics.
  • Pupil-involving third cranial nerve (CN III) palsy:[2]
    • When the pupil is involved in a CN III palsy, it is fixed and dilated (or minimally reactive). A partially dilated pupil which reacts sluggishly to light suggests a relative pupil-sparing CN III palsy:
      • CN III palsies with involvement of pupil: requires urgent neuro-imaging with MRI (with magnetic resonance angiography - MRA) or high resolution CT angiograpy (CTA), with or without a lumbar puncture if MRA or CTA are normal.
      • Relative pupil-sparing CN III palsy: tends to be ischaemic in nature and does not need such urgent investigations unless there is progression.
    • Other signs of a CN III palsy include features of external ophthalmoplegia: limitation of extraocular movements in all fields of gaze except temporally and a ptosis.
    • There may also be evidence of aberrant regeneration where there has been previous CN III damage: as the patient looks down, their lid goes up.
    • The differential diagnosis of a CN III palsy includes: Parinaud's syndrome and giant cell arteritis can also cause CN III palsies. An extradural haematoma causes a progressively dilating pupil, due to gradual compression of the third nerve and similarly, a unilateral dilated pupil in a comatose patient should prompt the thought of a subarachnoid haemorrhage.
  • (Adie's) tonic pupil:[1]
    • This describes a unilateral (80% of cases), mydriatic pupil in otherwise healthy patients (typically, young adults, especially women).
    • Over months to years, the pupil diminishes in size to eventually become miotic. There is sluggish, sectoral or no reaction to light but a normal near reflex. Re-dilation after the near response is slow.
    • Slit-lamp examination may reveal slow, vermiform contractions of the iris but ultimately, the diagnosis is confirmed by the pupil's hypersensitivity to weak miotic drops (eg, 0.05-0.125% pilocarpine) which causes the abnormal pupil to contract vigorously and the normal pupil minimally.
    • Occasionally, it is associated with diminished deep tendon reflexes (Holmes-Adie syndrome) ± autonomic nerve dysfunction.
    • The exact cause is not known but it often occurs after a viral illness (eg, herpes zoster ophthalmicus) and denervation of the postganglionic supply to the sphincter pupillae is described.
    • This tends to be a benign condition and the patient is simply observed. However, infants <1 year old should be referred to a paediatric neurologist to rule out familial dystonias (Riley-Day syndrome).[2] 
  • Argyll Robertson pupils - these are caused by neurosyphilis. Although usually asymptomatic, they have characteristic features on examination. These include bilateral (usually asymmetrical) small, irregular pupils showing a light-near dissociation. They are difficult to dilate. Management is related to the underlying disease.

Topical drugs

  • Dilating - sympathomimetics (eg, phenylephrine, adrenaline) and antimuscarinics (eg, cyclopentolate, tropicamide, atropine).
  • Constricting - muscarinic agonists (eg, pilocarpine).

Systemic drugs

  • Dilating - sympathomimetics (eg, adrenaline (epinephrine)) and antimuscarinics (eg, atropine). Think also of tricyclic antidepressants, amfetamines and ecstasy.
  • Constricting - opiates (eg, morphine and organophosphates).
  • Apply fluorescein stain to look for defects (if you suspect corneal perforation, perform a Seidel's test).
  • If you have access to a slit lamp, assess the cornea from the anterior (epithelial) surface, through the stroma and to the posterior (endothelial) surface by gently moving the focus backwards by a few millimetres. Look for defects (fluorescein uptake), oedema (area of haziness) and infiltrates (a well-demarcated white lesion within the stroma). Vascularisation may occur over the surface or through the stroma, indicating more long-standing disease.
  • Examine the rest of the globe and its adnexae. If the symptoms warrant it, do a full systemic examination.

Further assessment of the cornea in a specialist unit

  • Pachymetry - this is the measurement of corneal thickness. It is a painless investigation involving placing a measuring probe lightly on the surface of the anaesthetised cornea.
  • Specular microscopy - this is a photographic investigation that enables the corneal endothelial cells to be accurately assessed.
  • Corneal topography - this is another painless investigation which maps the surface of the cornea rather like an ordnance survey map, showing the gradient at each spot and therefore highlighting asymmetries, such as are found in the dystrophic conditions, for example.
  • Microbiological investigations - a corneal scrape (clinic) or biopsy (theatre) may need to be done.